User Tools

Site Tools


Navigation Menu

Flight-Control

<
Previous mounth
04/27/2024
>
Next mounth
SMTWFTS
17
21
21
22
22
23
23
24
24
25
25
26
26
27
27
1828293001020304
1905060708091011
2012131415161718
2119202122232425









Hot Projects

SEEDStack

SEEDStack - Open 3D printable seed/sprouting systemDIY Food Hacking

UCSSPM

UCSSPM - Unified Clear-Sky Solar Prediction ModelOpen Solar Power

picoReflow

picoReflow - DIY PID Reflow Oven Controller based on RaspberryPiDIY Reflow Soldering

PiGI

PiGI - DIY Geiger Counter based on RaspberryPiRasPi Geiger Counter

DIY ARA-2000

Active Wideband Receiver Antenna for SDR - ARA-2000Wideband Antenna

DSpace

DSPace - Map everythingMap everything!

Mission-Tags

This is an old revision of the document!


Review: Managed Low-Power Ethernet Switches

In a past Mission-Log, we've reviewed the power consumption of so labeled “green” Switches (consumer-grade/unmanaged) that could be used in off-grid environments and they performed really well. Compliant with IEEE 802.3az Energy Efficient Ethernet, these switches consume less energy by cutting down on power consumption when the traffic volume is low and automatically measure the length of the connected cables to adjust power usage if cable connections are shorter than 20 meters. In addition, they monitor link status of every port and drastically reduce power consumption when a port is without a link.

With more technology and infrastructure, the need increased for more Ethernet features like VLANs, trunks and many other features, usually only offered by expensive, loud and very power hungry managed/enterprise switches. Luckily this has changed and we could test and already deploy managed but very low power and fanless (silent) switches: Check out the D-Link DGS-1100-8

Power Consumption Analysis

For better comparison all measurement results have been put together:

DGS-1008D G2 DGS-1008D G3 DGS-1100-8 Rev A1
Clients ModeCurrentPowerCurrentPowerCurrent Power Wall
0 Switch only 66-93mA 0.33-0.46W 67-111mA 0.33-0.55W 105mA 0.8W
1 Client Stdby 100-160mA 0.5-0.8W 109-124mA 0.54-0.62W 131mA 1W
2 Client Stdby 141-194mA 0.70-0.97W 153-161mA 0.76-0.80W 154mA 1.1W
2 Client Idle 160-200mA 0.8-1W 170mA 0.85W 212mA 1.5W
3 Client SCP 250mA 1.25W 210-220mA 1.07W 238mA 1.7W
4 Client SCP 250mA 1.25W 210-220mA 1.07W 264mA 1.9W

Reliability & Performance

The DGS-1008D test candidate has been up and running 24×7 for more than 365 days now without any glitch or the necessity to power cycle. Power saving often leads to compromises in performance but the switch performed equally well compared to a CISCO 3560, that was in use before power consumption became a major issue.

Conclusion

Grid powered devices still have the luxury to be able to consume more power than absolutely necessary, since the limiting factor is money and not power itself. Off-Grid scenarios change that point of view on costs, as the value is no longer money, but the painfully finite element of power itself.

There are still a lot of devices out there with a standby-consumption of well above 10W, the DGS-1008D G3 connects 4 clients, actively transfers a lot of data and consumes about 1W. D-link obviously did a good job with this, although there is a little curiosity in StandBy: The G2 consumes a little less power in StandBy, when no clients are connected but the G3 saves considerably more power when active so overall the G3 is a very good evolutionary step in low-power consumption Gigabit-Ethernet technology.

The only drawback of these switches is their un-managed nature. Hopefully, in the future even managed switches can operate with this kind of power consumption profile.

Other manufacturers, who also build similar products, may always send us their products for hardcore real live evaluation as well :)

Discussion

fe80:7a55:2272:5f44:5b19:aa03:f171:2ae8, 2016/01/13 22:54

Hi,

what's the firmware version you are running on the dongle?

I have tried to get this dongle work on my ubuntu machines, raspberry and open wrt device.. but no way.

QMI, NDIS.. none of those have worked.

Do you provide modules/packages working for openwrt whith this fix?

chrono, 2016/01/26 13:31

Ahoy,

I haven't got the time to go into details right now, you could have a look into the openwrt-devel mailinglist archives, there is plenty of info there, I tried to get it into current openwrt but there were some admin issues about signing off stuff so it didn't make it. The fix is included in kernel 4.2 IIRC so for now you probably have to build your own openwrt image as stated above. It's easy, so build your own if you need it to work. Other infos about versions, HW info and AT query commands are all in the ML, when this mission log get's released (this is a working template :)) I can try to gather up all info about it in one post to make it easier for people to find.

fe80:7a55:2272:5f44:5b19:aa03:f171:2ae8, 2016/01/13 22:58

Forgot that this is arch dependent! :D

Has this fix being merged to upstream?

I would like to get some this dongle work out of the box.

Enter your comment. Wiki syntax is allowed:
I S Y O O