User Tools

Site Tools

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
mission:log:2012:02:03:is-burning-wood-bad [2013/06/05 14:34] – external edit 127.0.0.1mission:log:2012:02:03:is-burning-wood-bad [2015/04/10 10:04] – [Conclusion] chrono
Line 93: Line 93:
 </columns> </columns>
  
-<note important>According to these statistics, at least **1.97 billion trees** worldwide were cut down in 2005 to be **used as fuelwood**.</note>+<WRAP round important>According to these statistics, at least **1.97 billion trees** worldwide were cut down in 2005 to be **used as fuelwood**.</WRAP>
 ==== How much is that in area ==== ==== How much is that in area ====
  
Line 155: Line 155:
 ===== Dangers & risks ===== ===== Dangers & risks =====
  
-Use of biomass as primary energy source for households in itself is not a cause for concern. However, when resources are harvested unsustainably and energy conversion technologies are inefficient, there are serious adverse consequences for health, the environment, and economic development. Over 1 million people — mostly women and children — die prematurely every year because of exposure to indoor air pollution (Smoke of open fires). Valuable time and effort are devoted to fuel collection instead of education or income generation. Environmental damage can also result, such as land degradation and regional air pollution.+Use of biomass as primary energy source for households in itself is not a cause for concern. However, when resources are harvested unsustainably and energy conversion technologies are inefficient, there are serious adverse consequences for health, the environment and economic development. Over 1 million people — mostly women and children — die prematurely every year because of exposure to indoor air pollution (Smoke of open fires). Valuable time and effort are devoted to fuel collection instead of education or income generation. Environmental damage can also result, such as land degradation and regional air pollution.
  
 The environmental impacts of inefficient fuelwood use are not really new. Burning wood has contributed to the deforestation of numerous regions of the world. Even at the early stages of industrialization, local pollution of air and water was a well known problem.  The environmental impacts of inefficient fuelwood use are not really new. Burning wood has contributed to the deforestation of numerous regions of the world. Even at the early stages of industrialization, local pollution of air and water was a well known problem. 
Line 164: Line 164:
 Burning wood is neither good nor bad. The systematic tendency of "developed" society and industry to blow things out of sustainable proportion is bad. Being controlled by blind greed or irrational belief and fear, not considering the consequences or not reacting to early warnings is worse. But the worst thing is, to simply do nothing. Burning wood is neither good nor bad. The systematic tendency of "developed" society and industry to blow things out of sustainable proportion is bad. Being controlled by blind greed or irrational belief and fear, not considering the consequences or not reacting to early warnings is worse. But the worst thing is, to simply do nothing.
  
-The goal in biomass fuel and energy conversion research should be to find ways to support households and people in developing nations, who have been traditionally relying on wood as primary energy source and currently have no means to help themselves protecting their health or environment. Simple, cheap and easy to build open-resource hardware like [[lab:helios|Helios]] address these issues.+The goal in biomass fuel and energy conversion research should be to find ways to support households and people in developing nations, who have been traditionally relying on wood as primary energy source and currently have no means to help themselves protecting their health or environment. Simple, cheap and easy to build open-resource hardware like [[lab:helios|Helios]] or any other TLUD concept can address these issues.
  
-People in industry nations, who statistically need significantly more power per person than developing nations and //choose// to burn wood in an environment, where other options are available, should consider small and efficient biomass-gasifiers in local, [[http://www.fundamentalform.com/html/biomass_gasifier_breakthrough.html|community based cogeneration systems]] to generate heat and electricity at the same time. +People in industry nations, who statistically need significantly more power per person than developing nations and //choose// to burn wood in an environment, where other options are available, should consider small and efficient biomass-gasifiers in local, community operated cogeneration systems like a [[http://www.allpowerlabs.com/oldsite/tag/open-source/|GEK]] or [[http://www.fundamentalform.com/html/biomass_gasifier_breakthrough.html|this one]] to generate heat and electricity at the same time. 
  
 Burning biomass must not become a simple and cheap way to relieve the political and industrial dependency on oil, coal and gas by firing big industry operated grid-power plants with biomass. Burning biomass must not become a simple and cheap way to relieve the political and industrial dependency on oil, coal and gas by firing big industry operated grid-power plants with biomass.
Trace:

Page Tools